The Daily reaches 100,000 paid subscribers on iPad

The publication has amassed more than 100,000 paid subscribers on the iPad, making it the third top-grossing iPad app in the iTunes Store last year. Of those 100,000, about half pay The Daily‘s $0.99 per week subscription fee, and the other half are annual ($39.99 per year) subscribers, according to publisher Greg Clayman.

Pretty impressive, and the price seems about right.

(In contrast Berlingske, a major Danish news paper, just released the pricing strategy for their new iPad app: ~$60 per month. That’s just the way you think when you’re used to selling the good ol’ Sunday paper for ~$5-6, and having a yearly subscription for a daily fix of ink on pulp at ~$900.)

/via

— # # # # #

Who cares about stuttering playback on your tablet, right?

Surprisingly, by Stephen Levy in Wired:

That’s why, in a sense, some of the iPad comparisons and cavils you may read today in the hands-on reviews of Fire are somewhat irrelevant in light of this larger issue. Yes, the Fire lacks the industrial-design pyrotechnics that make fanboys foam at the mouth like the iPad does. But who cares? Like a lizard shedding its skin, next year there will be another Fire and in three years the original will look as antiquated as the bizarre-looking Kindle 1 appears today. When you pay $199 for Fire, you’re not buying a gadget—you’re filing citizen papers for the digital duchy of Amazonia.

“Who cares”? Is that you, Mr. Levy?

I’m sure Amazon will sell a nice amount of Kindle Fires, but I really don’t buy the argument that no one cares about wonky navigation and stuttering playback, if they are just given a golden ticket to lots of movies and books by The DoucheDuke of Amazon.

Apple has currently set the bar for tablets, and they set it damn high. Either do something better, or something else.

I mean, if Microsoft and Nokia can, so can the other guys.

# # # # # # #

iPad concept app adds patina to your digital photos

Karen Archey reporting from AOL’s 7 on 7 conference:

Camille Utterback and Erica Sadun came together around the Japanese concept “sabi” — roughly translated to English as the beauty and authority that an object gains with age — and how this idea might be applied to the mercurial realm of consumer technology. Sadun set to work writing code for an iPad2 photo application that captures images by the prompt of a violent shake, and another that burns images into the iPad picture plane based on the length of time that a user just lets the device be. The results are odd Cubist style abstract photo-mosaics with a Zen undercurrent. While it remains dubious how well the duo engaged the notion of “sabi” (it seems as if the idea of creating a patina on software remains paradoxical), Utterback and Sadun did succeed amazingly in producing an iPad2 app that may well have commercial viability — and the results looked pretty cool to boot.

I’d love to see that app!

Also, filing this one under: Digital Patina.

(via artinfo.com.)

# # # # # # # #

How can you show you’re a book version when you don’t have any books?

Dominic Basulto blogged about how you could put emotional value on digital objects and somehow talks about digital patina, which—being the subject of my bachelor’s thesis—is something I find very, very interesting:

How can Tablet users replicate these types of “statements”? One idea that a colleague mentioned to me involved the notion of “dynamic weathering” of applications — the more that you use an app, the more that it would appear “weathered” and used. People would know how often you were reading by how “worn” your iPad’s screen looked, for example.

I think this is the closest we come right now in the physical space:

Pattern

He moves on a bit and talks about the “books as objects for conversation”:

Finally, there’s the whole idea of using books as a conversation starter. The classic example, of course, is the young man on the subway who catches the eye of a beautiful young girl and decides to initiate the courtship ritual through a casual, “Oh, I love that book, too.”

Today, the only possibility would be for the guy to lean over the girl and read what was on her screen, thus somehow invading her private sphere. How can we design our way around that? Would you have a LED-display on the backside of your iPad telling the other passengers what you were reading?

It’s interesting how a lot of emotion gets lost in purely digital interaction, and how we could apply some “wearability” to the design to represent the patination as a result of extended use. How this could be done is something I think about every single day but haven’t found the answer to yet.

James Bridle also wrote a lovely post on the emotion-less eBooks as well, but in October 2010:

The problem here is that these are all arguments about the physical book: about its physicality. And while traditional books are physical objects, that’s not the core of our relationship with them. The truth is that books are essentially not physical objects, but temporal ones.

So the real problem with the ebook as it stands is that it denies us many of these temporal aspects, which produces a kind of cognitive dissonance. And there’s a social layer that forms around this, another timeline of reading reviews and discussing with friends, that the ebook could actually exploit better than the physical book, if we work on it some more. We really need to look at how we address this temporal mode with ebooks.

He’s wonderfully optimistic about the potential in eBooks seeing they don’t have the ability as being something you display on your shelves, but something you enjoy with your friends and strangers alike while you read it.

# # # #

Favorite new, old gadget: USB Typewriter

If I had a typewriter lying around, I’d buy the modification set instantly. Just think how great it would be to hammer out your next blog post to the sounds of clack!clack!clack!

The USBTypewriter™ is a new and groundbreaking innovation in the field of obsolescence.  Lovers of the look, feel, and quality of old fashioned manual typewriters can now use them as keyboards for any USB-capable computer, such as a PC, Mac, or even iPad!

Prices range from $75 for a DIY kit to $450 for a vintage typewriter that is already modded. I might have to look for an old typewriter at the flea market soon.

USB Typewriter.

# # #

Apple has changed section 3.3.2

Matt Drance found a change in Apple’s iPhone Developer Program License Agreement—in particular, section 3.3.2 that pissed off a lot of people. It used to read:

No interpreted code may be downloaded or used in an Application except for code that is interpreted and run by Apple’s Documented APIs and built-in interpreter(s).

Now it reads:

Unless otherwise approved by Apple in writing, no interpreted code may be downloaded or used in an Application except for code that is interpreted and run by Apple’s Documented APIs and built-in interpreter(s). Notwithstanding the foregoing, with Apple’s prior written consent, an Application may use embedded interpreted code in a limited way if such use is solely for providing minor features or functionality that are consistent with the intended and advertised purpose of the Application.

As Matt points out, this could open up the window for some of those that were really fucked over by this—game developers in particular.

(And no, this does not “open up the platform”, but it removes a fraction of what some of the critics were most pissed off about.)

Apple Outsider » Hello, Lua.

# # # # #

Walled gardens as misguided metaphor

Neven Mrgan’s reaction to the term “walled garden” as something that can be described as despicably closed, when the benefits of having something that is closed and cared for can also be of immense beauty:

A software store is not an actual garden, not literally. But enough people have used this metaphor that it’s worth thinking for a second about what it’s actually supposed to mean. I’m assuming we’re supposed to compare this approach to the freer alternatives such as community gardens and city parks. Ignoring for a moment the fact that these gardens are also regulated by serious restrictions on what one can and can’t do, it still puzzles me that the ‘walled garden’ is presented as an obviously undesirable structure.

Recommended reading for everyone that wants a nuanced view on the closed app store vs. open web discussion.

The Walled Garden – Neven Mrgan’s tumbl.

# # # # # # # # #

On the Wired iPad app

It’s basically a bunch of stacks, images and xml-data and seems to be rather quickly thrown together:

“Perhaps the most interesting thing to note is that there’s not a whole lot here which can’t be implemented using HTML5. But frankly, I think Adobe’s got the right approach here. HTML5 and CSS are far from baggage free. It appears Adobe could offer faster, painless route electronic magazine creation for publishers, a more efficient solution in terms of CPU usage and page rendering, and most importantly, the capability of offering superior integration with native operating system functions.”

From The Hip — Bundle Diving In The WIRED iPad App..

# # # # #